Tennessee Documentary History
  Multiple Collection Search     View bookbag 
your bookbag has 0 items 


Title: [Letter] 1834 Jan. 17, Nashville [to] Rev[erend] Finis Ewing, Lexington, MO / T. C. Anderson : a machine readable transcription of an image
Author:Anderson, T. C.
Availability:

This work is the property of the Tennessee State Library and Archives, Nashville, TN. It may be used freely by individuals for research, teaching, and personal use as long as this statement of availability is included in the text. For all other use contact the Tennessee State Library and Archives, 403 Seventh Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0312. (615) 741-2764.

Date: January 17, 1834
Extent: 4p
Summary:This document is a letter, dated January 17, 1834, to Reverend Finis Ewing from T.C. Anderson, who worked in the office of the Revivalist, a publication of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. Anderson's letter is in reply to the reception of Ewing's most recent article for publication and also Ewing's expression of disapproval of a recently-published article by a man named Amicus. Anderson explains that Amicus had deceived him into thinking the article was approved by James Smith, Ewing's nephew and the Revivalist's editor.
Collection:Finis Ewing Papers
Box:I-A-4
Folder:2
Document:sl346
Keywords:




Page [1]  view page image

Revivalist Office Nashville Jan [January] 17 [added: 1834]
Father Ewing,

[added: p.s. Should you again notice [unclear: Amicus ], say nothing of the information herein given, still [unclear: sprat ] of him as the unknown] Your communication has just been handed to the printer. As a whole I am hugly [hugely] pleased with it. [unclear: Amicus ] was as unacceptable in this country as in yours. You may ask why was it published? I will answer

The author of that thing is a man of high political standing- has represented his country in different branches of the Government -- now fills a highly responsible station is a in the Judicary [Judiciary] department- is an ordained Minister in the church - wears gray hairs. A few days after brother Smith left for pa [Pennsylvania] , [unclear: Amicus ] came into




Page [2]  view page image

the Office, read me his communication and intimated to me that he and Smith had had a conversation on the subject, and that it was with the knowledge and approbation of brother Smith that he wrote upon that subject. I disliked the production, and had I exercised my own judgement I should not have published; but as I was acting as agent for brother Smith and as I supposed he had approved the authors intention to write, being thus delicately situated, I determined to let it go for waht [what] it was worth without not [note] or comment. Had I approved of the thing I would have expunged the acceptionable [exceptionable] parts, but I determined not to lay hands upon it.

Brother Smith has not yet returned but in a letter he recently inquired of me who [unclear: Amicus ] was, and expressed his disapprobation of the piece.

So much for [unclear: Amicus ].

I am well pleased with your friendly advise [advice], and hope it will be profitable.




Page [3]  view page image

But did you know the multiplicity of business devolving upon me in brother Smiths absence. you would be prepared to appologize [apologize] for an occasional typographical error, However I know the Revivalist to be a clear of errors as an paper in West.

Your remark in the communication I have taken the liberty to erase for the following reasons: First, it could not profit any person but the Editor _ and he will receve [receive] all the [unclear: benefits ][gap] without publishing that could be realized by its admition [admission]. Second, An Old Observer so stamps himself upon his communication that all who know the and man recognize him. And I was unwilling that censure should go forth from so high a sources without the privilege of making an offset by way of exploration, and this would have been throwing more stuff into the Revivalist when I am sorry to say too much is already fond [found],




Page [4]  view page image

I hope the course persued [pursued] with this expanation [explanation] will meet your approbation. The [unclear: Garrons ] thought will not be lost. It is still floating upon the Ocean of mind and will yet find a resting place. [added:

Rev Finis Ewing Lexington Mo [Missouri] ,
[added: T C Anderson
Jan 17- 1834]]

Brother Smith will be at home in a few days- Give us another sermon soon- Your communications are always a treat-

With feelings of filial affection I subscribe myself a son in the Ministry of Christ
T. C. Anderson



A product of DLPS
To comment or inquire about content, contact UTK Special Collections
To report errors, contact UTK Special Collections